Let’s look at what a web application or widget is before we get into the specifics of a web application attack.
Many businesses have discovered that the internet is a low-cost way to communicate with potential clients and conduct business with existing ones over the past decade or two. Marketers, for example, can use the internet to learn more about the individuals who visit their websites and begin a dialogue with them. It’s possible to achieve this by allowing website users to sign up for newsletters, offer contact information when requesting product information, or supply information so that their next visit to a specific website can be customized.
With more than one billion Internet users, the web provides a great sales platform for a wide range of businesses, both large and small: in 2006, US e-commerce spending totaled $102.1 billion (Source: comScore Networks, 2007). All of this data has to be collected, saved, processed, and communicated in some way so that it can be used right away or in the future. Web applications, in the form of submitting fields, inquiry and login forms, shopping carts, and content management systems, allow this to occur. Therefore, they are essential for businesses to leverage their internet presence and build long-term and profitable relationships with potential clients and consumers. They are fundamental.
It’s no surprise that online applications have become so widespread. In spite of their widespread use, web apps are mostly unknown and misunderstood by the general public due to their highly technical and complicated nature.
Specified Web Applications
In terms of technology, the web is a highly programmable environment that permits mass customization through the quick deployment of a broad and diversified set of apps to millions of global consumers. Web browsers that may be customized and web applications that can be used by anybody are two of the most essential features of today’s websites.
Using a web browser, users can access and interact with content on a website’s pages. The static text and graphics showcase of the early and mid-1990s have long since been replaced by dynamic material that can be customized by the user according to their preferences and settings. Additionally, web pages can run client-side scripts that transform the Internet browser into an interface for software like webmail and interactive mapping (e.g., Yahoo Mail and Google Maps).
Furthermore, modern online sites enable the acquisition, processing, and transmission of sensitive consumer data (e.g., personal details, credit card numbers, and social security data) for immediate and recurrent use. Web apps are used to do this. In today’s digital world, features like e-mail and login pages, forms for customer assistance and product requests, online shopping carts, and content management systems help companies stay in touch with their consumers and prospects. This is a typical example of a web app.
Thus, web applications are computer programs designed to facilitate data submission and retrieval via the Internet using a user’s favorite browser. Users see the data in their browser once it has been generated by a web app via their web server dynamically (in a specified format, for example, HTML using CSS).
The fact that web applications can run on any operating system and browser on the client-side is another key benefit of web application development and maintenance. Users don’t have to download or install anything to use web applications, and they can do it almost instantly and for free.
The use of web apps and other associated technologies will continue to grow as more organizations realize the benefits of doing business online. In addition, as intranets and extranets have become more widely used, web applications have become more deeply embedded in communication infrastructures throughout organizations, increasing their breadth and potential for technological complexity and prowess.
Both off-the-shelf and custom web applications can be acquired.
The Most Common Attacks on Web Applications
90% of developers say there are more than ten vulnerabilities in an average production application. It is well-known by attackers that the greater urgency with which software is being released increases the likelihood of programming errors. Professionals in the field of cybercrime are engaged in a never-ending conflict. The attackers are continually trying to go a step ahead of today’s legacy application security solutions, and the defenses are always trying to keep up. In contrast to the rapid advancement of application security mechanisms, assaults against applications are also advancing at a rapid pace. A few of the most popular are:
Attacks Against Session Hijacking
When a session hijacking attack occurs, the session IDs are tampered with and altered. This unique ID is used to mark the time spent online by a user so that subsequent logins can be made more quickly and efficiently. It’s possible for attackers to take advantage of a weak session ID and use it to start a session hijacking attack. It’s possible for attackers to gain access to all the data that passes through a server during a given session, including user credentials that can be used to log into personal accounts.
Attacks that traverse the path
A path traversal (or directory traversal) attack is an application attack that focuses on an application’s root directory. When a dot-slash sequence is modified, path traversal attacks can get access to server files, which contain all of a system’s data. In addition to passwords, access tokens, and sensitive data, system backups may also be included in the data access.
65% of vulnerable applications have been the target of a SQL injection attack. Applications and network interactions can benefit from authorizations and authentications provided by SQL statements. Using corrupted SQL statements, a bad actor can manipulate applications into executing corrupted commands that allow them to get access to otherwise unauthorized regions of the system. The entire software environment is at the fingertips of cyber thieves, who can circumvent security checks and protocols by manipulating interactions between other web applications and gaining access to the core code.
XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
Cross-site scripting (XSS) is one of the most common types of application threats that may be found nowadays, according to the OWASP Top 10. Typically, attackers use a compromised link or a search for a vulnerability to gain access to the system’s core code, which they then distribute by email or text message. Cyber thieves can hijack HTTP requests by injecting malicious code into the client-side of the HTTP request if this application vulnerability is exploited. Cyber thieves have virtually unrestricted access to PII, including banking details, Social Security numbers, and even highly sensitive government data, thanks to their command of HTTP operations.
Deficiencies in Access Control
Often, the boundaries of applications are built in such a way that users cannot cross them. Only administrative teams have access to an application’s infrastructure and inner workings on one side. Access to the application’s front end is granted only to those who have been authenticated by the system. A broken access control attack occurs when people can get access to administrative areas. Third, on the OWASP Top 10 list, broken access control attacks compromise user credentials and the entire application infrastructure.
Defending Your Web Application from Malicious Attacks
Because an application attack can have a significant impact on both companies and consumers, it is critical to secure apps during development and deployment as well as to safeguard them after they are in production.
Application Development Security
Traditionally, application security measures were implemented only before deployment, at the bottom of the development waterfall. Dedicated application security experts would use penetration testing to identify application flaws. Precisely because of this, penetration testing is fraught with a slew of issues. First and foremost, it was created for waterfall development processes, in which only a small number of deployments—typically one or two per year—occur. Penetration testing cannot keep up with the pace of Agile and DevOps techniques, where code is released numerous times a day. Fixing security flaws takes a lot longer and costs more money because penetration testing is done at the conclusion of the development process. Lastly, conducting penetration tests calls for highly skilled and hard-to-retain application security professionals and their skill sets.
Legacy vulnerability scanning tools are another technique for finding flaws in a program during development. In this case, there are two kinds of legacy approaches. An early step in the software development life cycle (SDLC) is static application security testing (SAST), which looks for security flaws in the source code of an application. The goal of dynamic application security testing (DAST) is to detect flaws in an application while it is executing, rather than after the fact.
There are numerous issues with legacy application security scanning, including the fact that it is time-consuming. When it comes to identifying and documenting potential security risks, legacy static scanning is the first step. However, many of the so-called flaws detailed in those studies are actually false alarms. No danger notifications take up a substantial amount of time and resources for both development and security teams. Second, like penetration testing, legacy static scanning necessitates the hiring and retention of highly trained application security professionals. The drawbacks of legacy dynamic scanning are also present. First and foremost, DAST relies largely on the expertise of application security professionals. In addition to this, it becomes increasingly difficult to expand when firms add more apps to the development pipeline. Lastly, historical dynamic scanning tends to produce false negatives (missed vulnerabilities).
More and more companies are tackling application security from the inside out, rather than from the outside in. Developers can gain a real-time, accurate view of triggered vulnerabilities in development and beyond using interactive application security testing (IAST). With instrumentation, enterprises can move applications out of the testing phase and discover security flaws in the middle of the game. Only exploitable vulnerabilities are detected, which essentially eliminates false positives altogether. It is also easy to integrate application security into IDE procedures and Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) pipelines because the instrumentation is included in the product.
Production Application Security
Defending against web application assaults with perimeter protection has been a standard practice for at least two decades. When a security breach occurs, a collection of security alerts is generated into a PDF file by Web application firewalls (WAFs). There are a lot of false positives on the alert list, which makes it difficult to sort through and diagnose. In production, the security operations (SecOps) team is often the one most negatively affected by false positives, just as they are in development.
Runtime application self-protection (RASP), in contrast to WAFs, is simple to set up and maintain once in place. An application’s source code can be instrumented such that RASP can be embedded inside the application and always monitored. As a result, it relieves some of the weight on already overworked development teams by being significantly more accurate than legacy application tools. As a result of RASP’s connection to the application’s runtime, it can quickly discover and diagnose vulnerabilities before an attack may exploit them.
Test your website’s security with the VaporVM expert demo to see if it’s vulnerable to web application threats.